On Oct. 15, County Executive Dow Constantine, the Housing Development Consortium, and Laborers Local 242 partnered to host an event in support of the Veterans, Seniors, and Human Services Levy, which will be on the ballot on Nov. 7. The levy strengthens our communities by providing job training, employment opportunities, and housing stability to veterans, seniors, domestic violence survivors, and more. The levy extends existing efforts that have proven effective in reducing unemployment, homelessness, and emergency medical costs.

Labor and housing advocates have joined together to support this important cause. Partners from labor include Laborers Local 242, IAM 751, Teamsters Joint Council 28, and others.

To find out more about how you can support the levy, please visit https://yesonprop1.com/ or http://www.housingconsortium.org/vshsl/.

County Executive Dow Constantine, Prop 1 Campaign Manager Ross Cohen, BDG VP Brian Lloyd, and Local 242 Political Director Dale Bright celebrate HDC and Local 242’s donations to the Levy. Other organizations and friends present included Compass Housing Alliance, El Centro de la Raza, Teamsters Joint Council, IAM 751, and Laborers 440.

Senior Housing Developer, Beth Boram

Over the course of July, Beacon Development Group’s Seattle office will be hosting and participating in two phone banks for the city’s 2016 Housing Levy. The property tax, first approved off the ballot in 1981, will be up for renewal for the sixth time in August. The proposed $290 million levy will be dedicated to producing affordable housing options and providing support to low-income families, seniors, individuals with disabilities, and low-wage workers within Seattle.

After expanding upon its predecessor and leveraging every city dollar with $3 dollars from other sources, the 2009 Housing Levy outperformed expectations, exceeding the goal of producing 1,670 affordable housing units by roughly 30% and providing emergency rent assistance to 2,442 families.

President, Paul Purcell

Development Director, Brian Lloyd

This time around, the mayor is proposing to expand the levy once more. The levy can be broken down into four main programs:

• Rental Production & Preservation – $201 million, which would oversee the development and rehabilitation of 2,500 apartments with affordable rents secured for at least 50 years
• Operating & Maintenance – $42 million, which would provide subsidies for 510 units that serve extremely low-income individuals
• Homelessness Prevention – $11.5 million, which would supply rent assistance and stabilization services to 4,500 households
• Homeownership – $9.5 million, which would assist a total of 280 households with loans for home repairs and first-time home purchases

Each program would prioritize individuals making below 30% AMI, but would stretch to support those making up to 60% AMI.

The 2016 tax would cost just $122 annually for owners of median value homes. While the levy is focused on housing and homelessness prevention, the effect of taxpayer dollars would extend far beyond this. The Housing Levy would produce thousands of jobs in construction and management, increase the city’s energy and water efficiency with green building standard projects, and most importantly, foster inclusive, equitable communities throughout Seattle. Beacon Development Group is proud to be a part of the effort to renew the Seattle Housing Levy.

Brian Lloyd, Development Director at Beacon, recently participated in a Housing & Transit panel discussion sponsored by the Housing Development Consortium of Seattle-King County. Moderated by Bill Rumpf of Mercy Housing NW, other panelists included Claudia Balducci, Mayor of Bellevue, Rep. Jessyn Farrell, State Representative 46^th District, and Tony To of HomeSight.

Beacon is currently working on several Seattle Transit Oriented Development (TOD) projects: El Centro de la Raza’s Plaza Roberto Maestas in Beacon Hill, Mt. Baker Housing’s redevelopment of Mt. Baker Village in the Mt. Baker Station Area, and the construction of affordable housing in the Northgate neighborhood. Each project and neighborhood is different, but common themes exist across all affordable TOD work in Seattle.

With Sound Transit 3 on the horizon and the State Legislature recently enacting policy opportunities and tools for advancing affordable housing near transit, this is a very exciting moment in the region’s history. Therefore the key thread of the panel was recognizing and overcoming barriers by enacting tools locally to create affordable housing around transit centers. Panelists touched on the following topics.

• The Impact on Place and Community Engagement: TOD can have a significant impact on place, and therefore requires an early and long-term investment in community engagement and planning. Neighborhood plans, equity and a mix of uses all need to be respected and embraced.
• Request for Proposals (RFPs): Panelists were concerned with how RFP processes in station areas are created. Involving communities early is essential to ensure their desires are reflected in the documents, but this must also be balanced with allowing flexibility for developers to creatively achieve goals and outcomes.
• Transit Corridors: What is our definition of TOD? Due to escalating land prices directly around Light Rail Stations, developers must also look at the corridors that feed high capacity transit, such as frequent bus routes. PSRC’s Growing Transit Communities Partnership offers strategies for communities to use in planning along transit corridors.
• Surplus Properties: Having a plan in place for using surplus properties for affordable housing is essential in this conversation, and new tools will make it easier to access land near transit stations. As part of Sound Transit 3, the legislature required Sound Transit to implement a regional equitable TOD strategy, including offering 80% of surplus property for the purpose of developing affordable housing (either for sale, for long-term lease, or at no cost) .
• Land Acquisition: Land for TOD can be expensive. The Regional Equitable Development Initiative (REDI) Fund is one source for nonprofits to finance land acquisition in TOD areas. However, questions remain related to coordination between land acquisition funding and permanent funding.
• “Right-Sizing”: Right-sizing parking and commercial uses in TOD is an essential part of the development process and every neighborhood is different. There has recently been a lot of support for early studies of these issues in non-profit projects around the City of Seattle.

Both policymakers and developers stressed that a deeper level of conversation around these issues must take place for TOD barriers to be effectively overcome. Policymakers urged developers and advocates to develop as much consensus as possible in order to leverage policy making opportunities. The developers on the panel stressed that early involvement is key to success of TOD as well as flexibility around the deployment of funds, both in terms of incomes served and uses allowed in developments (i.e. the mix of housing, commercial and community space).